I
would not let my students use Wikipedia as a source for any research I would
encourage them to use it as a tool to help them to get ideas of topics that
they would like to explore further or to narrow down their search. As a legitimate
source, I would not have allowed them to use Wikipedia. The reason for this is
because you don’t know where the information came from or who wrote it. Mainly
I don’t know who wrote the information like the podcast said if someone does
not like all they do is delete it and write their information in its place.
There really no time for other people or scholars to look at the information
and verify the information validity. If I was giving them a research project of
some form I would demonstrate to them how I would use Wikipedia to come up with
search ideas, but I would strong suggest that they not use it as a resource on
any formal research that they do. If I was in the middle of a lesson and need
to look up something and did a quick search for information I might use the
information, just because Wikipedia is the first thing that would pop when searching
for information. Telling my students that further research is going to be
needed on the topic.
YouTube
on the other hand I would feel comfortable with my students using it as a
source. It is true that anyone can post just about anything on YouTube, but you
know who is doing the posting by looking at user name with a little research
you can find out if the person posting the information is legitimate. I use
YouTube videos all the time in my Health lessons when I was doing a long term
as the PE/Health teacher for the elementary schools in Fraser. You still need
to be able to back up the content with in the video with facts from a reliable
source, but feel more comfortable with using YouTube as a source then
Wikipedia.